Who should pay for clean development

Polaris solar PV net news: recent sentencing by the intermediate people’s Court in Jinhua city, Zhejiang Province, in one case, a trial court defendant, a chemical company to pay to the plaintiff, a company (defendant photovoltaic plant on the roof of the investor) electricity and overdue penalty more than 100,000 yuan.

Billion in investment in the photovoltaic industry, such a small case, there is no cause for more concern, seems surprising.

However, this was said to be “the first nationwide distributed photovoltaic roof tariff dispute” behind the small case, but hides the clean development mechanism design problem, one of the most prominent, is required for clean money, exactly who will pay?

Don’t know if anyone ever wanted to, Jinhua city, Zhejiang province before the new tariff for energy company regain what is behind?

Further, many domestic clean energy investor, why suffered power cuts, subsidy arrears and other helpless situation?

Bear the high costs of clean energy after and made great contributions to energy saving and emission reduction, clean energy investors, but also faced regain investment “marketing” risk. How embarrassing this is, what a pathetic picture.

Coincidence is that opened the world climate conference in Paris on the same day, “an unprecedented blockbuster smog, moving to Beijing city”. International political issues in this already far away, suddenly become ordinary people have to pay attention to problems in life.

Most perplexing is why we bear the increasingly high costs of clean development, but seems to become more and more serious environmental pollution.

On one side is everyone has the money to pay, and the rising renewable additional; the other side of it is clean energy similar to the Zhejiang Jinhua default risks encountered by investors, and increasing clean energy subsidy funding gap.

Which is wrong? Each of us the cost is not enough? Is the current mechanism itself there is a design flaw?

Perhaps we should think hard about this question, who should pay for clean development?

Related news:

First distributed PV projects sentencing tariff dispute

On the surface, clean development appear to be a national responsibility of public welfare undertakings, and preferably universal participation, sharing of responsibilities, because, after all, involves the immediate well-being of everyone. However, if such a simple, global climate change negotiations would not be so complicated, so difficult.

As climate talks have reached the most help the parties to cooperation–the key concepts of “common but differentiated responsibilities”, as for the cause of clean development in China, indeed everyone responsible, but a distinction should be made is who should bear the primary responsibility, who should bear the main responsibility. After all, this should be the one who paid for who, who pay less interest.

For now, most are wrangling in the global climate negotiations is the issue. More and more people realize that clean development is clearly not a cause, but is more of a benefit, or is a new pattern of interest.

Disassemble it from the perspective of the clean development predicament re-demarcate the boundaries of responsibility, at least logically make the problem simpler. That is, who caused the pollution, who will bear the costs; pollution who pay more. That is why over the years the course of global climate talks.

Though this is both in the world and within countries are not easy to implement, but this is the basic logic of development financing should be clean and only way of establishing a virtuous circle of the clean development mechanism.

At least, for Zhejiang Jinhua already carry high costs of clean energy the new energy company, as well as a large number of China’s clean energy investor, take back electricity (investment) “marketing” risk, should not be borne by them.

Related news:

First distributed PV projects sentencing tariff dispute

Original title: who should pay for clean development?

Posted in Solar Charger.